This is arithmetic, as Bill Clinton might say. In 2011, payments to individuals were 65 percent of federal spending, up from 26 percent in 1960.
America has created a welfare state, whether or not Americans admit it.
Actually, the share of people who receive federal benefits exceeds Romney’s 47 percent.
Based on its Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), the Census Bureau estimates that in mid-2011 — the latest available figures — the number of people with benefits came to 149.8 million, or 49 percent of the population.
But this figure is too low, because SIPP doesn’t include several major programs (farm subsidies and college loans and grants). With these, the total probably exceeds 50 percent.
The big programs are well-known. In 2011, Social Security had 49.6 million recipients and Medicare 45.6 million, most of them overlapping.
There were 5.2 million Americans with unemployment compensation and 3.2 million with veterans’ benefits.
An estimated 107.2 million people received “means-tested” benefits available to those with low incomes.
Medicaid had 80.5 million beneficiaries, food stamps 48.3 million and WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) 23.1 million.
Among households with means-tested benefits, almost a third received three or more.
President Obama hasn’t controlled this spending or opened a debate about which benefits might — in the national interest — be curbed.
His reluctance reflects conventional wisdom that questioning benefits is a political loser because it arouses the fears of millions of potential voters.
But Obama’s expediency leaves Romney an opening, albeit a high-risk one. He could seize the moral high ground by posing the hard questions necessary for a future that does not penalize economic growth or overburden today’s young with taxes or debt.
(H/T Young Cons)